FACT FINDING COMMITTEE
Committee Members: Chairman Phil Crosby, Shawn Graham, Regina Kim, Armen Demerjian, Ken Ashe and Hongmin Chen
Our interests (I), questions(Q) and concerns(S)
(Q) What’s the impact of doing nothing?
(I) Education contract sustainability
with/without Trinity VBS proposal?
(Q) Why isn’t the Ed
contract term longer than three years? Wouldn't a longer term bring
stability to for all concerned?
(Q)
Are the current
education contracts with Harvard fair and equitable for both parties?
(I) What is the sustainability posture of Devens with/without Trinity VBS
ptoposal?(I) The historic renovation
of VBS. Options - Do nothing, delay renovation, or
renovate now.
(I) All disposition options
remain viable- Understand the impact of residential growth of VBS as well as
future growth on disposition choices.
(Q) In what ways will Trinity VBS affect impact residential development of Grant
Road and Adams Circle?(I)
Sustaining
“affordable units” What are the strengths and
weakness of a community with far greater than typical levels of affordable
living units?
(I) Maintain Devens
“openness and current character. Will future planning keep Devens
relatively unchanged from the present open and large expanses of green?
(Q)
Will 246 rental units in VBS threaten, enhance or remain unchanged, the
character of Devens?
(I) Maintain or improve the marketability of our properties. How will the renovation VBS affect affect our property values? How will 246 rental units affect our property values>
(Q) Will we be able to keep the mix of properties as designed by the re-use plan?
(Q) What percentage of the buildings will be ADA?
(Q) In the short term, how will our tax rate be affected?
(Q) How is this going to impact our grid – utilities…?
(Q) Will a traffic impact study be done regarding VBS?
(I) Do not allow any properties to be a blight on our community.
(C) Why does Trinity have such a high affordable housing rate scheduled for Devens?
Documents:
| Devens Housing Affordability 2012 - >> | |||||||||
| (Transition units not included) | % | % | % | % | |||||
| (Veterans units are included) | Non-Senior | Non-Senior | Senior | Senior | Non-Senior | Non-Senior | Senior | Senior | |
| Total Units | Market Rate | Affordable | Market Rate | Affordable | Market Rate | Affordable | Market Rate | Affordable | |
| Harvard Portion of Devens | 75 | 62 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 82.7% | 17.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ayer Portion of Devens | 31 | 20 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 64.5% | 35.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Devens Total (February 2012) | 106 | 82 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 77.4% | 22.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Transformations (Zero-Energy Single Family Homes) | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Metric (Zero-Energy Townhomes) | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Devens Total (Post Transformations & Metric) | 126 | 102 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 81.0% | 19.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Vicksburg Square | 246 | 33 | 135 | 15 | 63 | 13.4% | 54.9% | 6.1% | 25.6% |
| Devens Total (Post Vicksburg) | 372 | 135 | 159 | 15 | 63 | 36.3% | 42.7% | 4.0% | 16.9% |
| "Grant Road" Housing | 156 | 156 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Estimated Devens buildout with 282 lifted | 472 | 472 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Devens Total (Post Grant Road) | 528 | 291 | 159 | 15 | 63 | 55.1% | 30.1% | 2.8% | 11.9% |
| Devens Total (Estimated Devens buildout post 282) | 1000 | 763 | 159 | 15 | 63 | 76.3% | 15.9% | 1.5% | 6.3% |
Ayer Harvard Unit Breakdown
of VBSHarvard Revere Hall Knox Hall Totals
One bedroom 10 6 16
Two bedroom 37 6 43
Three bedroom 8 4 12
Totals 55 16 71
Ayer Allen Hall Knox Hall Revere Hall Totals
One bedroom 12 6 2 20
Two bedroom 40 6 3 49
Three bedroom 16 4 8 28
Totals 68 16 13 97
Ayer (Senior) Hale
One bedroom 31
Two bedroom 47
Ayer Total 97+78=175
Total 246
Ayer 10 year Plan 2004 Ayer Affordable Housing Plan 2004 Harvard 10 year Plan Harvard Affordable Housing Plan 2004
Trinity Zoning Presentation of 11-12-2011 Trinity VBS Traffic Study by Woodlawn Design Group
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable sections from AYER documents:
FROM: Town of Ayer Affordable Housing Plan Draft March 2004
Key Findings
Compared to other towns nearby, Ayer has a significantly larger percentage of renter-occupied housing.
However, the production of single-family homes and conversion of renter housing
to homeownership units threaten Ayer’s housing diversity.
Ayer’s housing is becoming increasingly unaffordable to lower-income renters,
elderly owners
Housing Goals and Recommendations
1) Develop local capacity to plan, develop and manage affordable housing units.
3) Encourage private non-profit and for-profit developers to build housing that
meets local needs.
SUMMARY: AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN
Goal Actions, Roles & Responsibilities
1) Develop local capacity to plan and advocate for, as well as develop and
manage, affordable housing units.
1)
Develop and manage affordable ownership/rental housing
2) Increase the feasibility of developing needed housing
3) Encourage private developers to build needed housing
4)
Modify zoning bylaw to require and/or provide incentives for affordable,
mixed-income and accessible housing development
FROM: Ayer Community Development Plan 2004
Housing
GOALS
²
Develop local capacity to plan, develop, and manage Ayer’s housing needs.
²
Protect and enhance the historic character and traditional affordability of
existing neighborhoods.
²
Promote new development that meets local housing needs.
²
Provide housing choice throughout Ayer.
RECOMMENDATIONS
²
Focus resources on an Area Strategy to increase the supply of affordable units
in areas with established traditions of higher-density development.
²
Sponsor Local Initiative Program (LIP) affordable housing developments.
²
Identify private property that is both developable and suitable for
higher-density housing, acquire and “land bank” it for sale to a responsible
affordable housing developer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable sections from Harvard documents:
FROM: Harvard Community Development Plan November 2002
Sent:
Wednesday, February 29, 2012 11:50 AM by Ed StarzacSubject:
History of Vicksburg Square from 1990s on...With the re-alignment of the U.S. Army at Fort Devens in the mid-1990s, MassDevelopment commenced an active marketing effort to identify users for the Vicksburg Square buildings consistent with the 1994 Devens Reuse Plan and Devens By-Laws. To this effect, the first floor of Revere Hall (the quadrangle building fronting onto Rogers Field) was initially occupied by MassDevelopment’s Devens operations.
Small business users and several non-profit entities were found for the basement, second floor, and third floors.
Per a rent roll from 1999, small business users included the following:
AICS, Inc.
Akatyszewski Associates
Axonet, Inc.
Congivision, Inc.
Compliance Plus, Inc.
Electronic Productions
Harvard Financial Mortgage
Howe Surveying Assoc.
Integrity Technical Services
Netstal Machinery
Neurophysics Corp.
Quality Group, Inc.
Radiation Solutions
Schweitzer Engineering
Spinix Corporation
Tactical Technologies, Inc.
Cynthia S. Thomas, CPA
Tri-Cycle Product Design, Inc.
Non-profit and government users included:
Devens Enterprise Commission (reduced rate)
Freedom’s Way Heritage Area Commission (free rent)
Guild of St. Agnes
Loaves and Fishes (free rent)
Nashoba Valley Chamber of Commerce (reduced rate)
Taken together, these users occupied 28,204 square feet or approximately twenty-five percent of Revere Hall. With MassDevelopment occupying most of the first floor, occupied space within the building was approximately 63,500 square feet (which is 57 percent of Revere Hall or 14.6 percent of the Vicksburg Square complex).
At some point in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the Devens Fire Chief expressed serious concerns with the fact that the Vicksburg Square buildings did not meet the requirements of the Commonwealth’s Fire Safety Code. MassDevelopment commissioned a number of reuse studies for the buildings, resulting in the identification of other deficiencies as follows:
The buildings lacked sprinkler systems for fire protection per the Fire Safety Code; Stairways in the buildings remained unenclosed and lacked appropriate railings and guards. Enclosure and upgrades are required per the Fire Safety Code.
Exterior walls and attic floor lack required insulation in order to meet Energy Code requirements in regard to thermal insulation, vapor barriers, as well as thermal conductivity and water porosity properties of the masonry structure; All building systems (electrical, water, HVAC) require full replacement; Lead paint and suspected asbestos-containing materials are present throughout the buildings and require remediation; Limited provision was made for handicapped accessibility other than ramps accessing the first floor of Revere Hall. Additional ramps, elevators, restroom accommodations, etc. would be required to meet code.
MassDevelopment evaluated a number of options including redeveloping Revere Hall itself. Analysis demonstrated that it would make more financial sense to relocate the small business and non-profit users from Revere Hall into newer, more energy-efficient buildings elsewhere on Devens. Many of the Revere Hall tenants moved into 94 Jackson, a former Army office building owned by MassDevelopment. The building is elevator served and meets modern building and life safety codes. Others found alternative space on Devens or in the surrounding towns. For example, Freedoms Way
is now in the Devens Recreation Center and Loaves and Fishes is in a new facility adjacent to the Post Office. MassDevelopment moved its operations into new office space at 33 Andrews Parkway.
Since vacating Revere Hall, MassDevelopment’s brokers and in-house marketing and real estate staff have coordinated an ongoing, comprehensive, integrated marketing plan to position Devens as a developing community and preferred destination for business.
Features have included a dedicated website, DevensCommunity.com; paid advertising in local, regional, statewide and national publications; collateral materials including newsletters and listings of available properties; event management; and media outreach. MassDevelopment’s real estate broker, NAI Hunneman, featured Vicksburg Square in a marketing effort during 2004 and 2005 (see attached brochure).
MassDevelopment staff and its agents have worked consistently to interest potential tenants in redeveloping Vicksburg Square for uses consistent with the Reuse Plan and By-Laws. Without exception, these users have declined to make an offer on the buildings due to the major up-front investment of capital required to bring the buildings up to code, combined with their inefficient layouts. As seen from other research and development and office users on Devens and in surrounding towns, this type of user wants inexpensive facilities with open, modular floor plates, preferably on one floor.
Numerous potential users have opined that it would be more expensive to redevelop Vicksburg Square than to build new elsewhere. In the foreseeable future, residential or senior living is likely the only uses that will generate enough revenue to offset the considerable costs of redevelopment.
June 8th 2009 Warrant Article Re-Zoning VBS residential FYI
Ayer Financial Committee Rebuttal to Trinity Letter December 14, 2011
Town of Ayer Finance Committee
Vicksburg Square
The Finance Committee reviewed all available reports and information available regarding Trinity Financial’s proposed project for rental units at Vicksburg Square. On November 29, 2011 we, as a committee, released our opposition to the project which we see as a liability to the town. The goal of our committee was to review the information in an objective manner to gauge the impact on the town. Currently, Vicksburg Square sits solely within the borders of Devens under MassDevelopment
jurisdiction. Given that the fate of Devens itself is not final, we viewed the proposed Vicksburg Square housing proposal as 75% within the town of Ayer per the historical boundaries.
MassDevelopment currently operates Devens’ services of Fire, Police, DPW, Water, etc. For our committee to overlook the possibility of the town boundaries returning to historical lines would be short sighted. In Ayer we have been fortunate to balance our budget for FY2011 and FY 2012 without layoffs or drastic cuts in services. Our departments provide robust service to the community despite shrinking budgets. Our opinion is the additional level of staffing that may be required to accommodate an
additional 8% population increase to Ayer may be breaking point of our ability to balance a budget without a tax override or deep cuts in other line items. MassDevelopment itself which runs Devens reported an operational loss of ($8.7m) and ($6.2m) for FY2009 and FY2010 respectively. Municipalities are required to operate within a balanced budget and cannot have an operating loss.
Trinity has been successful in refurbishing various properties throughout the area. Vicksburg Square is unique from these properties due to its physical location. Of the eight completed mixed income properties listed on Trinity’s website, six of them are in urban settings and none have created dense housing in a suburban environment. In an urban setting the density of the area population generally includes an infrastructure of public transportation. Vicksburg Square residents would need to provide their own transportation with expenses being paid towards insurance, gas, maintenance, and possibly car payments. The other necessities for residents include food and clothing
.
Vicksburg’s proximity to Route 2 may result in residents heading to the larger shopping centers in Leominster, Lunenburg, and Fitchburg
for their shopping needs rather than Ayer. Trinity offers a range of $800 to $2,500 of disposable income per affordable unit. Depending on the breakdown of the affordable units, there may be more units with disposable incomes in the lower end of the range. To this committee there is little evidence that there will
be Trinity’s $6m – $8m in disposable income infused into the local economy.
The current housing market remains stagnant for both home sales and rentals. Trinity references Littleton Lyne and Old Town at 94% occupancy. The concerns of this committee, in addition to these, are the various home apartments and houses for rent through the town. A journey through town on East Main to West Main, Park Street to Groton School, and other areas of town results in a cornucopia of “For Rent” signs. The multi-family homeowners have fewer units to absorb financial loss due to tenants moving into the proposed development.
Growth is inevitable for most cities and towns. For every new house built there is a deficit impact on town services. The tax revenue from a dwelling does not offset the expenses. The deficit is higher for dwellings with school age children. Therefore, growth needs to be manageable and responsible. The impact of high density housing on current services can be traumatic due to a disproportionate balance of revenue to services. The argument that current services are provided by MassDevelopment and therefore has no bearing on Ayer or its neighboring towns is naïve. Should Devens revert back to its historical boundaries; the impact to Ayer’s services with an increase of 8% population will be traumatic. If 185 units (75% of the units) were taxed at the median value and tax rate, the tax revenue to the town would be approximately $600,000. Due to the high percentage of low income units deflating the tax revenue calculation, the town would receive $157,000. Only 26% of the average tax revenue to offset the increase in expenses.
The numbers presented by Trinity Financial portray the project only in a positive light. Shortfalls or deficits are preceded by the word “only”. We as a committee feel that despite the numerous presentations and reports there is more unknown than known in the numbers. In all cases we are charged with looking after the best interests of the Ayer taxpayers. Due to the ambiguity of the information, we feel a conservative approach is best for the town and therefore oppose the current project as presented.
Town of Ayer Finance Committee
Brian Muldoon, Chairman
Scott Houde, Vice Chairman
John Kilcommins, Clerk
Michael Pattenden, member
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------